For smaller manufacturers and midsize engineering teams that own firmware maintenance: compare releases, review changed components and keep the reasoning behind vulnerability decisions connected to your product history.
Keep component history connected across maintained product branches.
Review shared firmware evidence as devices and accessories evolve.
Maintain evidence as connected products receive software updates.
Engineering and security reviewers can inspect the extracted file, its location and the findings attached to it. Start with that context when deciding what needs investigation or a new assessment.
This example uses older DAP2360 networking firmware. Coverage for your gateway, building device or energy controller is qualified separately.
Specialist security consultancies, labs and embedded engineering firms can evaluate a sample release pair. Measure whether component history and retained review context reduce repeated work in your own assessments.
Compare recurring assessments with a sample image pair. Check findings, coverage and triage suggestions against your analysts’ conclusions.
Review the evidence exports alongside your existing methods. Automated control assessments support your work; they do not replace a conformity assessment or certification.
Evaluate a repeatable release-evidence handover with a client’s authorisation, including identified components, review decisions and stated limitations.
Tell us about your firmware and your team's priorities, and we will show you the parts of FDIE that matter most for your case.
21-day free trial on the full platform. No card, no automatic conversion.
